引言】互联网虚拟财产继承问题探讨引言
　　【第一章】网络虚拟财产的内涵界定及其可继承性分析
　　【第二章】我国网络虚拟财产继承的现状及问题
　　【第三章】域外继承网络虚拟财产的法律实践及启示
　　【第四章】完善我国网络虚拟财产继承法的建议
　　【参考文献】结语与参考文献
 

　　摘 要

　　在互联网时代的大背景下，各种网络产品与网络服务层出不穷。网络虚拟财产便是随着互联网的不断发展而出现的新的财产类型，它与人们的工作、生活息息相关。这些网络虚拟财产通常是由网络用户花费大量的时间、精力以及财力而获得，因而网络虚拟财产从自身来讲，有着较大的经济或者精神价值。事实上，网络虚拟财产和实际财产二者之间的交易是非常普遍的，我们生活中无不充斥着网络虚拟财产和实际货币之间的兑换。随着互联网技术的飞速发展，用户数量不断增加，在网络虚拟财产继承方面的纠纷案件也随之增多。但是，由于人们对网络虚拟财产的内涵和可继承性认识模糊，且因为立法方面的滞后导致相关当事人的权责不够明晰，法院的裁判没有成形的法律可以参照，用户的相应权益也不能正常得到法律上的必要救济，从而使有关网络虚拟财产继承的问题始终得不到有效解决。从立法的角度明确指出网络虚拟财产的财产属性并将其划归在遗产范围内，已经成为当前亟待解决的问题。网络虚拟财产有着有用性、稀缺性、流转性等特点，需要从继承法的视角为其提供有效保护。这在保护网络虚拟财产当事人合法权益、推动互联网产业健康和谐发展，以及完善我国相关法制等方面，均有着举足轻重的意义。伴随网络虚拟财产继承问题的不断出现，其已经发展成为相关学术界重视的焦点问题。

　　本文在针对各类理论与文献资料做出归类与分析的基础上，首先对网络虚拟财产的内涵界定及可继承性进行分析，主要从四个方面进行概括性论述，即网络虚拟财产的内涵、主要特征及网络虚拟财产继承的必要性和可行性。其中，也就学界现存的对网络虚拟财产在财产方面的属性众多不同的观点，进行归纳探讨。然后，结合当前网络虚拟财产的立法和司法现状，从现存法律供给存在疏漏、可继承属性还存在争议、与隐私权的冲突尚需调适、继承客体范围不够明晰、价值评估机制有待健全、第三方机制作用尚未彰显等六个方面分析网络虚拟财产继承的实际状况，梳理目前情况下所存在的主要问题，并结合域外网络虚拟财产继承的主要做法进行分析，以美国、德国、韩国和日本四个国家为例，从其网络虚拟财产继承当中得到启示，以资为进一步完善我国网络虚拟财产继承规则汲取有益经验。最后，从明确网络虚拟财产继承的法律属性、确立继承规则、妥善解决与隐私权的冲突、明确继承的客体范围、科学评估网络虚拟财产的实际价值以及充分发挥公证机构的权利保障作用等方面，提出相关的完善建议。

　　我国互联网技术尚未成熟，缺少足够的经验，但也应做到与时俱进，认识并重视网络虚拟财产的继承问题，从本国网络虚拟财产继承的发展现状入手，参考其他国家的成熟立法实践，构建完善的法律制度，同时在实践当中努力应对持续出现的网络虚拟财产继承相关的棘手难题。

　　关键词：网络虚拟财产；继承权；继承规则.

　　ABSTRACT

　　In the context of the Internet, various network products and networkservices emerge one after another. Network virtual property is a new typeof property that emerges with the continuous development of the Internet,and it is closely related to people's work and life. These network virtualassets are usually obtained by network users who spend a lot of time,energy and financial resources. Therefore, network virtual assets havegreat economic or spiritual value from their own. In fact, the transactionbetween the virtual property of the network and the actual property isvery common, and we are all filled with the exchange between the virtualproperty of the network and the real money. With the rapid developmentof Internet technology, the number of users continues to break through,and disputes in the inheritance of virtual property on the Internet havealso increased. However, because people's understanding of theconnotation and inheritability of cyber virtual property is vague, and thelag of legislation leads to the lack of clarity of the relevant parties' rightsand responsibilities, the court's referee has no formal law to refer to, andthe corresponding rights of the users can not normally obtain thenecessary legal relief, so that the problem of inheriting the virtualproperty of the network is not always solved. It is a problem that needs tobe solved urgently from the perspective of legislation to clearly point outthe property attributes of the virtual property of the network and toclassify it into the scope of the heritage. Network virtual property has thecharacteristics of usefulness, scarcity, and circulation, and needs toprovide effective protection from the perspective of inheritance law. Thisis of great significance in protecting the legitimate rights and interests ofthe parties of the virtual property of the Internet, promoting the healthyand harmonious development of the Internet industry, and improving therelevant legal system in China. With the continuous emergence of theproblem of virtual inheritance of the network, it has developed into afocus of attention in the relevant academic circles.

　　Based on the classification and analysis of various theories andliteratures, this paper firstly analyzes the connotation definition andinheritability of network virtual property, mainly from four aspects,namely the connotation of network virtual property, the main features andthe necessity and feasibility of the inheritance of network virtual property.

　　Among them, there are many different viewpoints on the property of thevirtual property of the network in the academic circle, and the discussionis summarized. Then, combined with the current legislation and judicialstatus of the network virtual property, there are still some disputes fromthe existing legal supply, the disputes with the privacy rights still need tobe adjusted, the scope of the inheritance object is not clear enough, thevalue evaluation mechanism needs to be improved, and the third partyThe mechanism has not yet demonstrated six aspects to analyze the actualsituation of network virtual property inheritance, sort out the mainproblems existing under the current situation, and analyze the mainpractices of virtual property inheritance in extraterritorial networks, withthe United States, Germany, South Korea and Japan. For example, thestate has gained inspiration from its network virtual property inheritance,and has taken useful experience to further improve China's networkvirtual property inheritance rules. Finally, propose suggestions fromgiving the clear definition of Network virtual property’s legal attributes,establishing inheritance rules, properly resolving conflicts with privacyrights, defining the scope of inherited objects, scientifically assessing theactual value of virtual property on the network, and giving full play to therights guarantee function of the notary office.

　　The Internet technology of China is immature and lack of sufficientexperience, but it should also keep pace with the times, recognize and payattention to the inheritance of the network virtual property, starting fromthe development status of the network virtual property’s inheritance inour country, and refer to the mature legislative practice of other countries,establish a perfect legal system, and at the same time, try our best to copewith the thorny problems about inheriting the network virtual property.

　　KEYWORDS: Network virtual property; Right of inheritance;Inheritance rules
 

　　目 录

　　引 言

　　一、网络虚拟财产的内涵界定及其可继承性分析

　　（一）网络虚拟财产的内涵界定
　　（二）网络虚拟财产的主要特征
　　（三）网络虚拟财产继承的必要性
　　（四）网络虚拟财产继承的可行性

　　二、我国网络虚拟财产继承的现状及问题

　　（一）我国网络虚拟财产继承问题的状况
　　1.立法现状
　　2.司法现状
　　（二）我国网络虚拟财产继承存在的问题
　　1.现存法律供给存在疏漏
　　2.可继承属性还存在争议
　　3.与隐私权的冲突尚需调适
　　4.继承客体范围不够明晰
　　5.价值评估机制有待健全
　　6.第三方机制作用尚未彰显

　　三、域外网络虚拟财产继承的法律实践及启示

　　（一）域外网络虚拟财产继承的法律实践
　　1.美国
　　2.德国
　　3.韩国
　　4.日本
　　（二）域外网络虚拟财产继承的启示
　　1.明确网络虚拟财产的法律地位
　　2.通过立法明确网络虚拟财产的继承规则
　　3.强化网络服务运营商的相关法律义务

　　四、完善我国网络虚拟财产继承问题的法律建议

　　（一）明确网络虚拟财产继承的法律属性
　　（二）合理设计网络虚拟财产的继承规则
　　（三）以标准条款协调好与隐私权的冲突
　　（四）厘定网络虚拟财产继承的客体范围
　　（五）科学评估网络虚拟财产的实际价值
　　（六）有效发挥公证机构的权利保障作用

　　结 语

　　参考文献

　　致 谢